Disruptors and other piercing weapons, since the Contingency has strong shields and armor but poor hull. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Subscribe to download. - Wave Motion Gun - Powerful yamato superweapon that can 1 shot a battleship or even a titan but takes time to fire up and cooldown. I personally, have always liked shields. Yours will have a 60-75% chance to hit, depending on tracking and accuracy and ect. Since the ship tipe have been change i always had this idea in my mind, that the kinetic weapons should have a malus damage on armor like energy weapons have it on shield. Physics research area comprises the fields: Computing, Field Manipulation and Particles. For corvettes, do it at a 1:1 ratio. Later on, fancy long range weapons start to appear and by the advent of kinetic batteries and heavy launchers there is little to no reason to use the L sized. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewKinetic energy must always be either zero or a positive value. even on the autocannon's worst target it has 40% the effectiveness of plasma. ago • Edited 4 yr. Titans are commonly artillery ships, so they have an energy+kinetic combo that works well with artillery battleships, but artillery ships suffer from minimal range and get rekt by torpedos. AI because they never spec Point Defense. In my personal opinion, I would think battleships with tachyon lancers, pd and plasma throwers are the best. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. . 28s. Each pair was moved to Star System with no populated planets, spaceports, mining\science\battle\energy stations (because after "attackallfleet" command they will participate in battle - we don`t need this). that is a 325% difference in base DPS before adjusting for modifiers. Search the Wiki for a detailed information, but I would recommend wait until you get to late-game to fight it, depending on the Leviathan, you'll need between 30k and 70k in fleet power to fight it. Then again, Kinetic weapons wreck shields better than Disruptors, and larger varients also bypass armour. I mean if you look at the missiles you know you can shoot them down whit point defense, energy. For standard battles, it’s tough to beat the reliability and versatility of the simple plasma accelerator, complete with high damage and low energy cost. Incorporating secondary weapons such as lasers or autocannons can. We could pretend that they use some kind of crazy magnetic-containment sabot, driven by steam produced by the reactor. In Stellaris, Kinetic weapons are made to take out enemy shields. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. 13. The best choice is to cause a lower-estimate local power surge, as this will cause the Expedition to proceed for only 50 Energy Credits. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Yours will have a 60-75% chance to hit, depending on tracking and accuracy and ect. 16 DPS. 50, vs Gamma lasers at 6. 54, 29. 25. Greetings r/Stellaris ! So I am wondering, what is the best way to provide energy credits for your empire. Now yes, it's Stellaris and we can just say "new meta - XL battleships with Carrier core and line computer ftw" and yes you can even design an artillery battleship that isn't awful (as long as you don't mix kinetic weapons with plasma due to the range differences) but when the best way to use a titan (which can't have a line computer). I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. 24 , 24. If you're fighting other empires, I go with a mix of artillery battleships (pick your poison, energy or kinetic) and carrier battleships (because high evasion corvettes suck). With limited number of disengage chances , you can safely deal pop shots to the hull and not worry about them retreating before the big guns can cycle. Threw a titan in because why not. I suppose the more corvettes/frigates you have containing auto cannons the better outcome you will have in the cq battle. AI because they never spec Point Defense. The Perdition Beam still gets some benefits from energy repeatables, but it's literally the only thing in my fleet that is going to be bothered by an enemy's shields which isn't great. Only use armor on ships if you have a spare place due to energy reasons (talking early game). Plasma also has lower accuracy and I think a slightly longer cooldown per shot. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Destroyers are ideal for a few decades before battleships become common, but. Vice versa for armor - still 200 per volley, and against hull you do 225 damage per volley, which is better than the blank weapons. Flak does less damage per shot, in contrast, but is. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. 2 days faster than the Arc. Global Energy Management, Automated Exploration Protocols, Specialized. Kinetic weapons (Gauss Cannons) are good against. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Hangars is fighters, but upgrades are wonky for strike craft so the actual combat value will degrade as you get further into repeatables and PD negates them. Then w1 does 3. The Sentinel Point Defense does 1-4 damage vs Flak Battery's 1-3, so I'm inclined to pick the energy PD over the kinetic PD. Advanced kinetic weapons require Volatile Motes to build. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. The mass driver statline just does more raw dps and it's bonuses are better suited to taking out other corvettes then lasers, as well as having a slight range edge. JVendin • 6 yr. P. 99. Most people would recommend piling up the free. Plasma throwers are good for that, but those are usually mid-game cruiser+ weapons. Even ignoring natural tile resources if needed. Unless you have the pops to work the jobs a building or district produces, it's worse than useless. gamefaqs_astrophys. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. I feel like until this is in play/a rational system is in place AI and auto design features and finalized UI is premature. Energy shields could be useful against kinetic projectiles, we just don't know to what extent. In addition, when the Galactic. #7. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. So, let's say you are shooting at a ship that has 50% armor reduction, 100 shields, and 100 hull. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Starfighters! [3. 1) Kinetics and lasers both suffer no bonus or penalty vs shields, people keep saying lasers are bad vs shields but no such tooltip exists and indeed tests have shown they do full damage to shields just like kinetics do. 00. Scourge Swarm Strikers: on paper these look very powerful until you see their movement speed. Subscribe to download. . Lasers: a good early-game weapon before you get to the Proton Launcher, but goes obsolete once you reach that tech level. Energy had your basic lasers, apocalyptic tachyons, and a plethora of variants in between for anti shield duty, anti armor duty, weird electric clouds and anything else you can think of. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. You need Flak and Kinetic Artillery and they sit along the kinetic tree. When the enemy has many ships bigger the crusiers make X slot battleships with the X slot being either energy or kinetic, and all L slots being the oopspote damage type. The question is what I want to do in my next game. Try to put a priority on researching the building upgrades for your energy producing buildings. an explosive vs. I just go with auto-complete for whatever roles I have the sections set for, and leave it at that. In my 22 hours I've only. But that is only even taking into account the enemy damage types. Relation to environment. 1 (played yesterday) funnily enough i had much better results with full on kinetic than arc emitters and empty, arc amitters and lightning and arc emitters and pd+hangar, despite heavily researching energy weapon repeatables and no kinetic ones, than with focused arc emitters. Fixes to mass missiles being bad. 6 combat rebalance update. 6+) For those unaware, the "~" command will bring up the console. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. It's totally backwards to me. Energy is good at baseline, and gets better automatically through tech progress. If the enemy uses missiles, just smack PD on your ships to counter. The tachyon has 90% armor pen, and -33% shield damage. PD is slightly harder hitting, Flak can reach a higher Tracking. Energy is good at baseline, and gets better automatically through tech progress. Energy vs Scourge, Kinetic vs Unbidden, disrupters (corvette swarm is my preferred tactic) vs Contingency, torp or disrupter corvettes vs Gray Tempest, etc. Every fleet I make I try to balance both weapon types, like energy and kinetic, as well as distance profiles. Traits. AI because they never spec Point Defense. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Originally posted by Surge: As it stands, Kinetics are pointless and underpowered. These were originally planned as energy only but during play we found out that with a few more perks they make awesome armies as well! This is the only species that really “needs” to be psionic and cybernetic. Stellaris. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Looking for a complete list of working cheats for Stellaris game? Our site contains all the existing codes and various tricks. AI because they never spec Point Defense. So the drop-off for energy weapons is around 33 percent less base damage to players in Super mode. Let w1 be 1 energy and 2 kinetic and w2 the other way around and let d1 be 2 shields and 1 armor and d2 the opposite. The energy of a body or a system with respect to the motion of the body or of the particles in the system. Small plasma cannon- 6. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Kinetic energy is the energy an object has because of its motion. I haven't played in almost a year. Armor- 12. . The rest of the slots aren't that critical, but you can put whirlwind missiles in any medium slots and small. 5 inf. Kinetic pair and Energy pair (G vs A; P vs L). Armor is good against Kinetic weapons. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Applying a force requires us to do work. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Kinetic Weapons. Age of Wonders 4 Empire of Sin Cities: Skylines 2 Crusader Kings 3 Europa Universalis 4 Hearts of Iron 4 Hunter: The Reckoning Imperator: Rome Prison Architect Stellaris Surviving Mars Surviving the Aftermath Vampire: The Masquerade Victoria 3. tech_kinetic_artillery_1: Kinetic Battery: tech_kinetic_artillery_2: Kinetic Artillery. 2. The mega cannon is good against everything, since weapon systems can target individually that means most of the damage bonuses are wasted and that there are no obvious weapons to synergize with. Large broadside battleship. Certain buildings and other sources. I stick to only energy and kinetic weapons, and don't even touch strike craft or missiles. 1 Comments. Received widsom is yes, you should take Mass Drivers or Lasers. Another key point to note: Energy torpedoes CANNOT be shot down by PD. 07s in total. strike craft? The late-game counter triangle is Artillery Battleship > Carrier Battleship > Torpedo Corvette > Artillery Battleship, so at a simplistic level it's rocks-paper-scissors between those weapon types. But how about the. Both! Kinetic weapons have a bonus against Shields and malus against Armor, while Laser ones have the opposite. Energy Siphons appear to be better than Kinetics for ripping down enemy shields until you get the Level 3 Mass Drivers, and this is actually a rather potent combination with Lasers, because Lasers deal. I pretty much always go for missles in the beginning in fact that is one of the first things I do when I start the game is refit all of my ships to missiles. First thing to mention IMO is that the breakeven point for conventional vs bypass, if you assume even energy/kinetic repeatables (though not actually the case in practice as we both know since engineering always lags behind), is actually (mostly) about the target’s defensive repeatables, not your own weapons repeatables. Destroyers- if you use them, should be built for alpha and to die. The advantage of the kinetic artillery, which i think is the prime advanatage of all kinetics, is that they're a lower energy cost. If you have 5-6 fleets of those battleships and titans you can kill an unbidden fleet and the anchor with no losses. Like now missiles really suck so barely anybody uses them. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…I haven't played in almost a year. It is easier for weapons to ignore, but also easier to bulk up. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. Hold up, the ai ABSOLUTELY takes into account Starbase power, not just relative fleet power. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. I separated them in pairs. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Oh, and also because that's where my mind goes as a reader of the Honor Harrington series. Potential Energy is the stored energy in an object or system because of its position or configuration. Depends kinda on what for a fleet design you are aiming for and what you prefer. Battleship - Full X and L weapons. that is a 325% difference in base DPS before adjusting for modifiers. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. AI because they never spec Point Defense. I haven't played in almost a year. Each pair was moved to Star System with no populated planets, spaceports, miningscienceattleenergy stations (because after "attackallfleet" command they will participate in battle - we don`t need this). Title Card Overlay by Wi. Now yes, it's Stellaris and we can just say "new meta - XL battleships with Carrier core and line computer ftw" and yes you can even design an artillery battleship that isn't awful (as long as you don't mix kinetic weapons with plasma due to the range differences) but when the best way to use a titan (which can't have a line computer). In Stellaris, one can benefit from this for quicker achievement of the following:. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Thoughts on 3. I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. HugsAndSnuggles. (2) attacker with long range kinetic (1) hunter with long range kinetic. Armor,shields and kinetic/energy weapons balanced towards the enemy fleet composition. armour and kinetic weapons will get enough tier 3 technologies to get to tier 4. Missile weapons suck, energy weapons are ok, but mostly situational (you should only ever use plasma throwers vs armor and neutron torpedoes vs shields), and you really can't go wrong with kinetic. where: m — Mass;. the Kinetic X slot weapons have a cooldown of 11 days while the other Energy X weapons have a cooldown like 0. If the enemy has a lot of shields, go for kinetic. 7 Technology List – T to Z. I also have no use for the energy repeatables because I'm going trade federation and getting my energy from trade instead of an energy planet. 68,5 average) so enemies have a higher chance to disengange. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. So the net profit is very tiny once you factor in upkeep. Directly opposite :) Energy weapon are main and kinetic only situational early-game + anti-shield role (kinetic artillery & Flaks). . I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Quick reference: Defenses are good against what they are: physical defense vs physical weapons, energy defense vs energy weapons. Penetration doesn't "cover all bases" in a multiplayer context - penetrating weapons are countered by hardening components, which can be added to most builds at little opportunity cost. It's even worse if multiple missiles are aiming for the same target. Designations tell what kind of weapons and defense were deployed. Distruptors are good brawling weapons for close range front line ships. Energy Siphon isn't a bad weapon for the time you get it; its a fine one. I've mainly played Stellaris while using auto-best for my ships. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. Penetration is an important part of the metagame, especially around the T2 tech level, but it's an RPS balancing act like kinetic vs energy and PD vs missiles. Age of Wonders 4 Empire of Sin Cities: Skylines 2 Crusader Kings 3 Europa Universalis 4 Hearts of Iron 4 Hunter: The Reckoning Imperator: Rome Prison Architect Stellaris Surviving Mars Surviving the Aftermath Vampire: The Masquerade Victoria 3. In my 22 hours I've only. Because Trade is an inefficient resource, unless you pick up bonuses that make it better, and those bonuses require you to pick specific Species Traits, Traditions, etc. I currently struggle to balance damage types, fleet speed and fleet ranges. In my 22 hours I've only. Energy and Kinetic point defense systems, and they both cost the same in terms of power and alloys, and have the same cooldown, accuracy and range. At 90% evasion 60% tracking, there’s a 45% chance to hit with small weapons. Kauldric Jul 30, 2022 @ 12:58pm. Energy vs Scourge, Kinetic vs Unbidden, disrupters (corvette swarm is my preferred tactic) vs Contingency, torp or disrupter corvettes vs Gray Tempest, etc. Kinetic energy is not a vector. Which is the better weapon to place in our large slots? Should we use neutron launchers? how about cloud lightning? Is the secret really to use kinetic artil. But how about the. Proton launchers are not torpedos, they are energy weapons and are not affected by any kind of point defence. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. Accuracy is the standard/max to-hit of a weapon. For every other component, just use the best available. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. even on the autocannon's worst target it has 40% the effectiveness of plasma. Oct 15, 2017 @ 2:14am AC vs MD nothing changed, really: ACs are better early game, when ships are small, shields are not as. Shields provides an anti-energy layer of protection, based on the type of Shield component added, and tech bonuses. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Example: my mid game through end game fleets have at least: (2) attacker ships with close range kinetic (1) hunter work close kinetic. Hangars are themselves a penetrating weapon, and shield hardeners are your best shot at keeping your small ships alive against them. 99. Also, they have the shortest range weapons out of all the crises. 0 unless otherwise noted. Energy and Kinetic point defense systems, and they both cost the same in terms of power and alloys, and have the same cooldown, accuracy and range. Missiles are good before everyone has shields; torpedos are best when everyone has shields, but before they all have point defense. For plasma, you don't need the laser tree, although having the red laser researched gives you plasma earlier. AI because they never spec Point Defense. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. 5 and 0. • 1 yr. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. 2 Kinetic Artillery is 80 average damage per day vs the Saturator's 115, while the Saturator has a higher multiplier against both shields and armor. Generally, you want your spinal mount to be a kinetic weapon or an arc emitter since you take out shields before you take out armor. R5: I tested several battleship designs against the Contingency. Use arc emitters and kinetic battery. 6. 27. they must be pretty good. Small and medium Laser and Kinetic weapons will considerably out-range the Torpedoes, and will likely hit your Frigates. One with a snare aura, level 1 guns and armor (cheap, expendable). A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. The first option is to use a Science Ship to study the Devourer's corpse, which will give players the chance to either harvest it for 10,000 Energy Credits, 2,000 Minerals, and 80 of Stellaris. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. AI because they never spec Point Defense. This is something I've been observing more and more as I play. I built my fleet to counter the enemy's (they had only missiles) by giving my ships Point Defense and Kinetic weapons to counter their shields. For standard battles, it’s tough to beat the reliability and versatility of the simple plasma accelerator, complete with high damage and low energy cost. Like now missiles really suck so barely anybody uses them. I have the weird feelings that if I had pursued missile research instead of switching to kinetics, I would have easily won that war. It relies primarily on pops working jobs to produce most resources, with mining or research stations built over space deposits as a secondary source. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 10:53. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. 2k. So yeah maybe I'll be skipping on the lightning weapons. Directly opposite :) Energy weapon are main and kinetic only situational early-game + anti-shield role (kinetic artillery & Flaks). In my 22 hours I've only. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewI haven't played in almost a year. So if you have Blue Lasers (tier 2 energy weapons) you’re probably better off with those (and hopefully a kinetic railgun to help with shields) than you would be with nuclear missiles (tier 1 explosive weapons). In my 22 hours I've only. Unlocking each requires you to have the proper level of strike craft technology and a matching. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Like many of the other Guardians, the Infinity Machine should be beatable by any Fleet of at least 40k Power, however a smaller Fleet of well-designed ships will also be able to overcome it. Kinetic pair and Energy pair (G vs A; P vs L). yea i mean the fallen empires rely heavily on them. hull and a bonus vs. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. I also have no use for the energy repeatables because I'm going trade federation and getting my energy from trade instead of an energy planet. I haven't played in almost a year. Mechanically, each type of spaceborne alien is considered a special type of empire,. Unlocks Teldar Plant, Teldar Ammunition Factory, Teldar Crystals. AI because they never spec Point Defense. Kinetic is Energy (for RTS) Subscribe. Point Defense does more damage per shot - its better at actually destroying incoming attackers because it kills them in less hits, giving them less of an opportunity to damage your fleet - if it hits, which is the critical distinction. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. In the first 100 years or so, missiles out-perform every other weapon system. . Shields- 1. The only time I took on a xenophobe awakened (before utopia) was with a combined fleet including: my fleet, the federation fleet,my allies and my vassals which amounted to roughly 620k against their 780k fleet. In my 22 hours I've only. Thus, shields are always better than armor or hull unless the enemy has specifically built kinetic batteries. In my 22 hours I've only. I'd have hoped Power Projection would've been based off your fleet power Vs the fleet power of your rivals. You earn the right to research it by defeating a giant space monster known as the Ether Drake, whose attacks are weak against shields. Kinetics do have on average slightly higher dps, so technically they chew through shields a bit quicker but not cause either. 1 giga cannon, 2 artillery, the rest some kind of laser. AI because they never spec Point Defense. My first game I went with Kinetic weapons and am now about 22 hours into the campaign and up to Railguns IV. I use 1 titan (each titan has a different aura) and the rest battleships. This is manily because there are fewer Physics research stations to build. None of these have anything to do with the kinetic tech tree so its not at all uncommon for me to be in like battleship/titan tech levels with only T1 mass drivers as my kinetic weapon :) Physics only have like power, energy buildings, sensors, combat computers and shields as high prio techs and you can put off both shields and energy. Missiles have few strengths and many weaknesses. They’ll have an average 75% chance to hit, minus (evasion - tracking), to a minimum of 0, so tracking can’t grant extra accuracy. Using Strike Craft against the Contingency is a question of whether you have enough of your own to overwhelm their strike craft and PD. It usually isn't ignored by weapons. Shields require energy from the ship's reactor and always regenerate, unlike Hull Points and Armor. Having fleet will stop them from declaring war at all. ago. But how about the. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. I haven't played in almost a year. For cases where certain specific kinetic weapons are preferred, see Revolvers Are Just Better or Shotguns Are Just Better. Scourge Swarm Strikers: on paper these look very powerful until you see their movement speed. In Stellaris, range actually matters very little and everything becomes a brawl where dps, tracking and. Even against level 1 and two starports mass drivers are slightly better, but it is a much narrower gap. Because i tink that the kinetic wepons right now give an advantage in combat. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. The late game threats - Fallen Empires, Prethoryn, Unbidden, etc. Autocannon vs Railgun is more up for debate for S and M. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. I'm surprised that I haven't seen a big thread on this already, but it should be discussed. Fleet Power: The Neutron Battleships had a fleet power of 86. plasma meanwhile has 5% of the effectiveness of. However, it looks like that at some point between then and now weapons were changed considerably. I've read that missiles are the 'OP' way to go from the start vs. Lasers: a good early-game weapon before you get to the Proton Launcher, but goes obsolete once you reach that tech level. Now I know about the Battleship / Kinetic Artillery and Plasma Cruiser Meta. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. So a tennis ball thrown to the right with a velocity of 5 m/s, has the exact same kinetic energy as a tennis ball thrown down with a velocity of 5 m/s. In the original release version of the game I reliably went with energy weapons and was happy with the results. Now kinetic weapons look much more attractive and the only big point in favor of energy weapons is the higher. An empire can build Resource Silos buildings on colonies and Resource Silo buildings on starbases to expand their storage capacity. Stellaris Mods Used: Extra Ship Components 3. All it does is make the first technology in every line of weapons into a rare technology, but upgrades to that. 6. In same time energy weapon became only stronger in time - lasers are very mediocre, plasma is strongest anti-armor gun (and we need it to deal with AE and Leviathans) and tachyons are simply best X-sized weapon in game. 2 kinetic, 1 laser, 2 shield, 1 armour corvette. Reply reply Firedashredragon • Strike craft is game of speed, the closer they are the better they hurt, but the ratio between the range and the survivability of the carrier and very important the enemy range. Gigacannon outclasses kinetic artillery in DPS and range unless you're going up against. There's a Policy that will let you decide what Trade Value turns into each month. 2k. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. Energy weapons are better at defeating shields and or armor, but they have lower overall DPS for the most part than kinetic weapons (not talking about tachyon. 1 How to use the Tech Id Cheat? 2 Stellaris Tech Id List – A-B. Showing 1 - 10 of 10 comments. Early game there are distinct performance differences between kinetics, energy and missile weapons leading to doctrines raised around employing weaponry of. I suspect that they are just terrible equipped on smaller ships but work well in mass on installed on larger ships. In the early game? I just messed up my Inward Perfection Ironman game because I upgraded my missile fleet to Autocannons. I've noticed that in base Stellaris minerals never run out through construction of extra mining stations while energy credits never stop being an issue (Even more with Machine empires, since both the Coordinator and Calculator jobs consume Energy, rather than one eating minerals while assembly is no longer minerals. All empires have a 15,000 starting storage capacity for each material resource except energy, which has a 50,000 starting storage capacity. I tend to favor Physics when I build sci labs, however. Titans.